Wheatsheaf Ring Sizer vs Triblet

[TDA20]

From reading the forum it seems Wheatsheaf is the gold standard brand for ring sizing in the UK. Does anyone know what the difference is between the stainless steel ring stick and the steel triblet?

http://www.cooksongold.com/Jewellery...prcode-999-AHY

http://www.cooksongold.com/Jewellery...prcode-999-823

Am I missing something? It seems a lot more to pay for a wooden handle? Are there advantages of one over the other?

Apologies if this is a silly question!

Tess

[Dennis]

The steel version is new and I have not seen or used it, but as described it is just a cheaper version.

The advantage of the brand is that it is the most commonly used in the UK and accurately calibrated to match the ring gauges. http://www.cooksongold.com/category_...af+ring+sizers Dennis.

[TDA20]

Thanks Dennis

[Paul Kay]

While not having one or both in hand, my guess is that the -AHY ring stick is just that, for sizing, being a thin cone of stainless style, accurately marked, whereas the -823 triblet is (semi-) solid steel, intended for actual forming, Though I would never use one like that with markings all the way around for such purposes, as they always mark the metal, so I prefer at least just partial markings, at best plain/unmarked, for forming.

[enigma]

I don't think thats the case, Paul.
The cheaper one states that it is for forming and actually the cheaper one is much heavier than the dearer one?
In fact the dearer one doesn't state that its for forming.

[TDA20]

Thanks Paul and Sarah, you can see why I was confused!

[Paul Kay]

I stand by my comment, Sarah, greater weight does not necessarily indicate greater cost, quality may well do so, for example the stainless steel of -AHY v. steel of -823. Nor do I see where I suggested that -AHY was for forming, but quite the opposite. So, having found my ancient Wheatsheaf -AHY version, I can confirm that it is constructed from a cone of 1.5mm stainless steel and (in my mind at least) intended solely for ring sizing. P.S. I had to dig out my genuine Wheatsheaf ring sizer, as it's a bit of an heirloom, so I tend not to use it as a day-to-day tool. Originally belonging to my father, he would have bought it in the late '50s - early '60s. It only sizes A-Z, without the +6 to cope with present day thicker fingers.

[NickD]

While not having one or both in hand, my guess is that the -AHY ring stick is just that, for sizing, being a thin cone of stainless style, accurately marked, whereas the -823 triblet is (semi-) solid steel, intended for actual forming, Though I would never use one like that with markings all the way around for such purposes, as they always mark the metal, so I prefer at least just partial markings, at best plain/unmarked, for forming.

Sorry to drag this up again but my customer ( daughter) has very high standards. I'm making a ring and have only used thus far the cheapo "plastic tie " type of finger measure,slid this onto my trusty unmarked triblet and then wrapped binding wire to find a size.I've not had many "real " customers and so have always been able to adjust to fit .Do most folk use the 999 AHY as their gauge? Would people advise a set of rings to accompany this?Are half sizes worth the bother?
Beautiful day here in East Anglia!

[Dennis]

Commiserations. I also have made many rings for family members and it has made me paranoid about getting the size right. That is, the smallest half size that will go on and off without a struggle.

It is worth choosing the Wheatsheaf brand, because it is standard in the UK, but the aluminium ring stick is a fair bit cheaper.
They are are available from various sources, for instance here:https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Jewellers...-/262526607095

There is no need to pay extra for half sizes, because they are easily marked by eye using a saw: just one short mark for each half size.

As far as ring sizers are concerned, yes half sizes are an advantage, as are rigid ones. Please note that if you are making a broad band , then you confirm the size by reading from its mid point. Dennis.