Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Making Seamless Tubing Using Argentium Silver.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,845

    Default Making Seamless Tubing Using Argentium Silver.

    I am well pleased with the beauty and enduring shine of Argentium silver, but some items of bullion are not yet available in the UK.

    So with some trepidation, I set out to make 3.0mm tubing, using strip 0.4mm thick and 15.0mm wide.

    It turned out to be surprisingly easy, first to swage it in a swage block and then form it around a steel rod until the edges met using a fibre jawed vice. Nylon jawed pliers might have done the same.

    Next the end of the tube was sharpened and flattened, so as to begin the drawing down process. The edges quickly came close together and were fluxed and fused with a long sharp flame using my Proxxon mini torch.

    The torch did struggle to fuse more than about 35.0mm in length, so I made several pieces. A Smith’s Little Torch might have been better.

    The tube was then further drawn to the required size for setting 0.3mm CZs. Final external diameter, 3.6mm. Not a seam in sight.
    Dennis.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails St1 Making Seamless Tube.jpg   St2 Making Seamless Tube.jpg  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    1,844

    Default

    Well that's really doing it old school, very satisfying I would expect

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,845

    Default

    Yes Bob, but also easier than I expected, except for getting the heat right.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,392

    Default

    This takes me back. I know how to do this but once I found you could actually buy the stuff I never did it again. We were taught to solder a copper wire into the tube to give you a better grip for pulling through the drawplate. I don't know if it makes a difference as I haven't done it any other way.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,845

    Default

    The wire saves wasting silver though and is even more useful with gold.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,392

    Default

    Another of those you know there was a reason but after 40 years you can't remember what it was!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    232

    Default

    I am a fan of your work Dennis, but, is the term ‘seamless’ technically correct? Right now I am experimenting with making seamless rings and they are named so because they have no solder joint at all. Naturally my eyes lit up when I saw your thread title but now I am left a little confused as to what ‘seamless’ actually means.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by handmadeblanks View Post
    I am a fan of your work Dennis, but, is the term ‘seamless’ technically correct? Right now I am experimenting with making seamless rings and they are named so because they have no solder joint at all. Naturally my eyes lit up when I saw your thread title but now I am left a little confused as to what ‘seamless’ actually means.
    Thank you but I guess that if two metal edges are connected by fusion without intervening solder, then they can be fairly described as joined seamlessly.
    No doubt technology such as x-rays might still detect an imperfect union, but at microscopic level nothing is what it seems. No pun intended. Dennis.
    Last edited by Dennis; 11-12-2017 at 10:03 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •