Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Flush setting in curved surfaces

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Romsey
    Posts
    5,258

    Default Flush setting in curved surfaces

    I was asked last night about what size of stone to use when flush setting in curved surfaces, so I mocked this up in CAD:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	flush_examples2.jpg 
Views:	146 
Size:	16.0 KB 
ID:	6555

    This is a 5mmx2.2mm oval cross-section, with 1-4mm stones (in 0.5mm increments) inset into it. Each stone has been moved so there is enough (virtual) material at the sides to be able to burnish it in; as the stones get larger, you can see that there's progressively more & more metal needs to be moved or removed top & bottom to set the stone (and the burnished area becomes progressively more oval too). In this example, I'd prefer to stick below 2.5mm to keep things clean.

    Needless to say, as surface gets more curved, you can really only use smaller stones.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    3,172

    Default

    That's a great example. Thanks Peter.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    724

    Default

    Yep. That will help a few people.
    Sums up what we concluded.
    As for burnishing only...I really don't get that.
    It can "work", but it doesn't really put much metal over the stones & that isn't great for slightly bendy items.
    Last edited by Gemsetterchris; 07-09-2014 at 11:43 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Romsey
    Posts
    5,258

    Default

    It was very much a case of a picture being worth a thousand words - rather than try to describe it, use the computer to do the hard work.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ps_bond View Post
    It was very much a case of a picture being worth a thousand words - rather than try to describe it, use the computer to do the hard work.
    Your right, but creating a CAD image needs some talent

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    cotswolds
    Posts
    3,385

    Default

    What a useful picture - and a great reminder of why I try to never set larger stones into curves!

    Thanks Peter

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    dear old Blighty - (in deepest Wiltshire)
    Posts
    1,638

    Default

    I think I am too old to learn to CAD - I give up with Photoshop!

    brilliant result, definitely many words from one picture.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Romsey
    Posts
    5,258

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gemsetterchris View Post
    As for burnishing only...I really don't get that.
    It can "work", but it doesn't really put much metal over the stones & that isn't great for slightly bendy items.
    Missed that earlier - depends what level of burnishing we're talking about. I'm not much of a fan of the powered rocker burnisher method Sam Alfano demos, I do use a similar one manually which displaces a decent amount of metal over the stone. Needle burnisher for small stones where it's appropriate. Or alternatively I'll hammer or use a pusher and displace metal that way; depends on what stone, what the mount looks like and mood at the time.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,851

    Default

    It would be interesting to contrast that model with a ring made of flat strip. Dennis.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    724

    Default

    It does depend on the job, I'll do whatever works best at the time

    A flat strip model won't look any different to the smaller stones shown.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •