Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Flush setting in curved surfaces

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Staffordshire
    Posts
    1,727

    Default

    Very helpful Peter thank you.....and you are quite right....a picture speaks a thousand words!!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    632

    Default

    Yes, this is very useful, Peter. Thanks.
    I flush set some 2.3mm stones in a 4mm wide D-wire ring the other day and was unhappy about having to set the stones so low in order to ensure the girdles at the sides were adequately covered by metal. Also, the tendency for the holes to want to be oval, not round, was hard to eliminate.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,851

    Default

    Well the point of my post above, is that if you consider a ring made from flat stock, the problem changes in that the stones have to be buried more deeply at the edges of the ring in order to be set in metal all round.

    I think that is quite quirky. As for the holes tending to be oval, that can be remedied by turning the setting burr by hand in a universal handle, like Cookson 999AZM, using a touch of oil for lubrication.

    That said I have seen a setter use a slightly oval hole and make an undercut on one of the narrow sides to click the stone into. this means it is already firm before you even start moving metal. Dennis.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Romsey
    Posts
    5,258

    Default

    A flat ring is thankfully a fairly shallow curvature. I can mock one up fairly quickly if you'd like?

    The hole being oval is the result once the metal has been moved (burnished, hammered or pushed!) to retain the stone which means the funnel leading down to the girdle cannot be a neat circle; it just shows less with smaller stones.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,851

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ps_bond View Post
    A flat ring is thankfully a fairly shallow curvature. I can mock one up fairly quickly if you'd like?
    Yes I think it would be interesting Peter, particularly if the two pictures were side by side. Dennis.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Romsey
    Posts
    5,258

    Default

    Not side-by-side, but here's a thick (3mm) ring with the stones inset; 1.0-4.0mm in 0.5mm increments again. The curvature of the ring means the problem is much less pronounced for these sizes.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	flush_examples3.jpg 
Views:	52 
Size:	15.7 KB 
ID:	6564

    And the original:

    Attachment 6555

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,851

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,067

    Default

    I need to set a 4mm diamond into a ring,do you know if it is possible to inset it into 6mm by 3mm D shape wire please?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    724

    Default

    It`s possible to set into the metal but *really* not a good idea.
    Last edited by Gemsetterchris; 10-09-2014 at 12:26 PM.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,067

    Default

    Thanks Chris, why do you say that ?
    I suggested claw set but the customer isnt keen so the suggestion atm is either inset or bezel set but until I get the wire Im not sure how a bezel would sit on it either ( I have some silver on order to make up the design first)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •