Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Confusion over hallmarking

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    19

    Default Confusion over hallmarking

    Hi, I just got a ring back from the assay office and the form it came back with states it's 925 silver. But I made it with PMC3, which I was told would be 999. The only parts of the ring that are sterling silver are the (buried) mounts. When I fired it, they were the only parts that flamed green. So what did I do wrong? I really needed it to be hallmarked as fine silver because that's what the commission was for.

    I can't actually check the hallmark itself, I don't have the optical equipment. I'm guessing the assay office takes the lowest quality component and hallmarks it as that? Although the ring is 6.6 grams of PMC silver. Argh! Any advice welcome!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    cotswolds
    Posts
    3,383

    Default

    If there are any sterling components, it will reduce the final quality to below .999. In some cases you can ask to have it marked 958 (Britannia), if the total amount of sterling is small, but obviously it's still not 999.

    If you want a finished piece marked as 999 it really does have to be fine silver and absolutely nothing else.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Bah! I didn't know. Although it wouldn't have mattered much because I couldn't get fine silver mounts. Thanks, I'll know next time!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sim View Post
    I'm guessing the assay office takes the lowest quality component and hallmarks it as that?
    I am afraid thats right.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,086

    Default

    I make some items with sterling and add on bits of 14ct and 18ct gold...they come back as sterling + metal. #Deflating

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Exeter, Devon
    Posts
    1,803

    Default

    Yes mine do too, its a bit much to be told that it is "other metal" when its GOLD especially as the price is high.

    Quote Originally Posted by pearlescence View Post
    I make some items with sterling and add on bits of 14ct and 18ct gold...they come back as sterling + metal. #Deflating

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    188

    Default

    If the gold component weighs over 1g will they hallmark it as such in a mixed metal piece? I've been wondering that for quite some time. For example, if you have a ring with a band consisting of sterling but a large karat gold component/accent weighing >1g, would they hallmark it with its appropriate quality or would they still state 925 + metal?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Barnstaple, Devon, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,533

    Default

    I don't know if it's applicable but when I sent in some mixed metal pieces made with sterling and copper the lovely lady at Brum Assay phoned to ask if I wanted 'metal' or 'copper' to be on the stamp. I chose copper. I wonder if they offer a similar scheme with gold?
    Di x

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    dear old Blighty - (in deepest Wiltshire)
    Posts
    1,638

    Default

    I have to give Brum a thumbs up for that one... they do call me and check if I want mine assayed and marked for gold. I have only had things returned just marked for sterling if they don't call me. I have never had any gold sent back with 'metal'.

    I did once have a customer give me some of their old gold and the assay checked it for quality. It came in at the old 8ct standard and they would not assay it as it was simply not of gold standard. They were happy to produce a lovely note that explained to my customer the lower than 9ct standard.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •