Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: Hallmarks...required if item isn't "sold"?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,088

    Default

    It's called a sponsor mark, not a maker's mark
    Author: Pearls A Practical Guide
    www.pearlsapractical.guide
    www.Pearlescence.co.uk

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    dear old Blighty - (in deepest Wiltshire)
    Posts
    1,638

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,404

    Default

    From the Edinburgh Assay Office guidelines.

    The Sponsor’s or Maker’s Mark
    This indicates the maker or sponsor of the article. In the UK this mark consists of at least two letters within a shield. No two marks are the same.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Rural Somerset, between Yeovil and Shepton Mallet
    Posts
    201

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldsmith View Post
    I don't know about the Cooksons offering that service, but I do know that if you just send items to the London Assay office they will assay and hallmark it with the LAO mark. I just know that loads of my pieces will go down in history as being made by Asprey as it has their hallmarks on it as they were commissioned or bought by them and sold in their shops around the world.

    I made this piece back in 1981.
    Attachment 8243
    James
    James - I have found the thread where this was discussed - HERE
    Barry the Flying Silversmith👍

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,902

    Default

    Barry, I saw that thread but didn't want to get involved. I think it would be great if it was the law that states the maker's mark should be on every hallmarked piece as Steve seemed to suggest, but we all know this is not true. Go to any high street jeweller and you will see their hallmark on the pieces they sell, do you actually believe they make the pieces. Ask yourself why the London Assay Office have a branch for collecting work for assay at Heathrow airport, most of the jewellery sold on the high street is made abroad these days, imported from the manufacturers in India or Thailand, then hallmarked in London with the shop's hallmark. I have a friend who owns a few jewellery shops and he can buy finished diamond set rings from Thailand for a cost that is less than the cost of just buying the gold and diamonds would be in the UK, without any manufacturing cost, so who can compete with that, and also the rings he buys all get hallmarked with his own registered hallmark as he is the commissioner of the pieces.
    As I said before the likes of Garrard, who have not had their own workshops since 1953, so anything that has a Garrard hallmark on it, dated after then was not actually made by Garrard. The only workshop staff employed by Garrard do stock cleaning and restorations. It's the same at Asprey in recent years.

    I have never in my life been employed at Asprey, but a friend of mine sent me this old Asprey Fifth Avenue catalogue that has a photo of me on it's second page. I was making an egg that Asprey purchased from my employer and then resold as their own manufacture complete with an Asprey Hallmark on it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	025- Forget me not egg2.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	81.8 KB 
ID:	8246Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Asprey 5th Ave catalogue 1993, front & page1.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	66.0 KB 
ID:	8247

    James

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Rural Somerset, between Yeovil and Shepton Mallet
    Posts
    201

    Default Hallmarks...required if item isn't "sold"?

    I think Steve covered this in the thread, that a Retailer as the sponsor, rather than a manufacturer, can put their mark on items made by their contractors.
    What I said was illegal was someone offering a service to use their registration to hallmark another persons else's items which are then returned to them for sale.
    This is not what retailers do.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Barry the Flying Silversmith👍

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BarryM View Post
    I think Steve covered this in the thread, that a Retailer as the sponsor, rather than a manufacturer, can put their mark on items made by their contractors.
    What I said was illegal was someone offering a service to use their registration to hallmark another persons else's items which are then returned to them for sale.
    This is not what retailers do.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Yes I see that Barry, I didn't know about Cookson's offer of this service.
    Last edited by Goldsmith; 18-10-2015 at 01:05 PM.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,404

    Default

    Cookson and all the other companies offer us already hallmarked ring shanks for us to resell if we so wish. We would be reselling rings as our own but not made by us or having our makers mark

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,088

    Default

    Would they not have to be re-assayed if anything done to them?
    Author: Pearls A Practical Guide
    www.pearlsapractical.guide
    www.Pearlescence.co.uk

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    127

    Default

    So it would be illegal for me to send a piece made by a friend, who isn't registered with an assay office, to be hallmarked with my mark? I'm not fully understanding why that would be illegal because surely the hallmark is assurance of the metal quality rather than anything to do with the maker of the piece? Or am I missing something?

    Just to add....this is just a scenario, I've not actually done this in case anyone was going to call me a lawbreaker

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •