-
You result will be the clincher, Josef.
-
Wow, I would not expect anyone to cast rings just for testing, thanks a lot!
Will be exciting to see the results! ![Smile](images/smilies/smile.png)
/Andreas
-
Just to add more to the confusion, when measuring - for instance - hot hands, or "time of the month" can make a difference of a size or two.
-
![Click image for larger version.
Name: DSC_0527.jpg
Views: 47
Size: 29.8 KB
ID: 6741](https://www.cooksongold.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6741&d=1413481524&thumb=1)
Raw castings trees
![Click image for larger version.
Name: DSC_0529.jpg
Views: 42
Size: 16.4 KB
ID: 6742](https://www.cooksongold.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6742&d=1413481542&thumb=1)
the wax model, 18 ct white gold, and platinum rings cut from the tree
![Click image for larger version.
Name: DSC_0530.jpg
Views: 45
Size: 23.4 KB
ID: 6743](https://www.cooksongold.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6743&d=1413481565&thumb=1)
The wax for comparison size N
![Click image for larger version.
Name: DSC_0531.jpg
Views: 47
Size: 23.3 KB
ID: 6744](https://www.cooksongold.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6744&d=1413481586&thumb=1)
Platinum raw casting M (ish)
![Click image for larger version.
Name: DSC_0534.jpg
Views: 45
Size: 22.6 KB
ID: 6745](https://www.cooksongold.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6745&d=1413481609&thumb=1)
White gold M(ish) bit of a wobbly cast that one !
-
![Click image for larger version.
Name: DSC_0535.jpg
Views: 38
Size: 23.2 KB
ID: 6746](https://www.cooksongold.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6746&d=1413486764&thumb=1)
Both rings with the inside cleaned up ready for hallmarking
![Click image for larger version.
Name: DSC_0537.jpg
Views: 35
Size: 30.4 KB
ID: 6747](https://www.cooksongold.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6747&d=1413486828&thumb=1)
Platinum M 1/2
![Click image for larger version.
Name: DSC_0540.jpg
Views: 35
Size: 28.8 KB
ID: 6748](https://www.cooksongold.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6748&d=1413486851&thumb=1)
White gold M 1/2
Hope this helps
-
So Josef, the rings became about one size smaller after casting, but removal of metal when polishing the inside caused them to end up a half size smaller.
This is what you predicted at the outset, when you said the wax should be a half size bigger than needed. However the The models made with a 3D printer are rougher than wax and need more finishing. So it is possible that rings cast from wax might need to start three quarters of a size bigger.
Also heavier rings will shrink more, so will need a further estimated allowance.
Thank you for clarifying the problem for us. I hope I have summarised it correctly. Dennis.
-
That Josef is a really useful demonstration of the debate, thank you for taking the time to do it, document it and share!!
Very much appreciated
-
Hi Dennis that sounds about right,but I still would only go half a size on average size grown rings as depending on which direction the rings are grown on the machine the grow lines effect it differently,I dont have a formula for this it just seems to work out ok. But if you need to make the ring to a certain dimension say for example a 3mm band its better to have a bit of meat on it to finish to the correct thickness so I would add a bit to the outer dimensions
-
No problem Tabby glad to help. I just hope the ring fits Icarleug If Im in doubt I always go bigger at least she can put it on then get it resized as opposed to not putting it on and getting it resized !
-
Really interesting thanks for sharing!
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks