Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Tumbling help!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    8

    Default Tumbling help!

    Hoping someone might be able to help me out with what I'm doing wrong please!

    Have got myself a mini tumbler to save on polishing time, but my pieces are not coming out nice and shiny like I was expecting. I thought maybe it was the pins, so I painstakingly removed them all, but it made no difference.

    Hopefully you can see the attachment. I'm using "PMC 960", and pieces made from the same stuff polished up beautifully when my tutor tumbled them! The shot is stainless steel of lots of different shapes, tumbled with barrelbrite.

    I'd be grateful for any advice!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails image.jpg  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,866

    Default

    Tumbling only burnishes, so if your piece has a texture when it goes in, it will have a texture when it comes out--but shiny. Dennis.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Thanks Dennis.
    Only, it didn't have a texture going in! It was lovely and smooth (I did most of the hard work before putting it in, it just needed the shiny finishing touch)! It did it to another piece as well (Alkemé this time, done separately).
    Last edited by anturdesigns; 10-12-2015 at 07:31 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    440

    Default

    Did you tumble a number of pieces together? I've pretty much cured any problem I had with pitting/dimpling by removing all the pins (as you did) from mixed shot. But I've made the mistake of tumbling a batch of pieces that included some with sharp edges/corners which gave me the same dimpling as the pins did. Is PMC960 appreciably softer than the sterling version? I understand it's a blend of fine and sterling clays.
    Alan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Yes, that's right Alan (on both fronts) re the 960. And I think you might be right on the pitting thing as well! Some of the pieces have sharp edges potentially. Going to try again with those pieces out (once I've re-sanded it!). Am I best just sticking to balls do you think?? What about these shapes... (See pic - hope it worked)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	34.1 KB 
ID:	8425

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    440

    Default

    It's difficult to tell if those shapes ("dish cones"?) are OK or not without doing a bit of trial and error, which you'd probably prefer to avoid... I have some similar "ball cone" shapes, mostly smooth and rounded all over, but with a small pin-like protuberance on one side similar to those in your photo - even though they don't look sharp, I suspect they may contribute to minor dimpling. If in doubt, I would just use the balls. Given the softness of PMC960 you might need to err on the side of caution. I use Argentium 960, the same silver content as yours but significantly harder even than sterling (at least, once it's been fully age-hardened by heating), and I still have to be very cautious. Have you checked what your tutor uses?
    Alan

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    43

    Default

    After similar problems, I have had better luck with my home tumbler by replacing the mixed shot with tiny, 2mm ball bearing style shot. Small enough to get in the nooks and crannies but no noticeable pitting.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •