Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Pumpkin Pie.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    dear old Blighty - (in deepest Wiltshire)
    Posts
    1,638

    Default

    Attachment 5653

    anyone want to try this for size? I have used the same methods for the rings... but up-scaled it for bangles and collars (I think??)

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Oxon
    Posts
    394

    Default

    Hi Wallace, can I ask why you have chosen 3.147 as Pi?
    It seems slightly odd, especially as you have gone to the level of 3 decimal places
    Although it probably doesn't make any real difference in practice.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Romsey
    Posts
    5,259

    Default

    Not sure I dare do any arithmetic after last time...
    For a 17.93mm diameter, circumference using Pi @ 3.147 = 56.426 to 3 dec places
    Using Pi @ 3.1415926535897932384626433832795 (copy & paste, Windows calculator) = 56.329 to 3 dec places.

    0.172% error.

    Measure with a micrometer. Mark with chalk. Cut with an axe.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    dear old Blighty - (in deepest Wiltshire)
    Posts
    1,638

    Default

    Lol.... Was trying to help. Isn't pi 3.14? At 4 decimal places in mm, it was just the sumif function and being old, the pi was probably rhubarb or something . It worked on the original. But need to check to conversion when I get to my main PC. Thanks for checking. Back to the machine with my calc (works better than my working out the fx iin excel). No- one has to use anything, lol...thanks for checking it though.
    Last edited by Wallace; 05-02-2014 at 08:51 AM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Oxon
    Posts
    394

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ps_bond View Post
    Measure with a micrometer. Mark with chalk. Cut with an axe.
    Lol - absolutely agree it makes no difference in real life.
    I was just curious as Wallace had gone to the trouble of calculating to 3 decmal places and used a strange value for Pi.
    I wondered if (s)he had picked up an anomaly in the original calculator that was needed to get it to work.
    Wallace - it would be more usual to use 3.142 - but 3.147 is fine :-)
    Thanks for doing it - I had been using the 'at the bench' one.
    Martyn.
    Last edited by trialuser; 05-02-2014 at 09:16 AM.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Banbury
    Posts
    167

    Default

    Thanks to all. Prefer Apple pie to either pumpkin or rhubarb but love easy ways to get it right
    Didi

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    668

    Default

    Perfection every time ... well almost
    http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~huberty/ma...pe/digits.html

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    8,870

    Default

    Great! beats measuring with binding wire.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Staffordshire
    Posts
    1,727

    Default

    Aaaaaagh

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Exeter, Devon
    Posts
    1,803

    Default

    Well I have used Wallace's chart and it works fine. The other day my 96 year old mum informed me that she had lots of necklaces and earrings now but could she have a ring to match a necklace and earrings that I made her for her birthday, so all I had to measure was a bit of string - worked fine, seems to be more accurate than my maths. Note to Dennis who kindly worked out some maths for me earlier, think I must have been asleep during maths lessons, can add up groceries in my head straight from the trolley/basket but anything more involved .........................

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •